Re: [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] Uprobes Implementation

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 19:50 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:

> > Srikar seemed to suggest it needed stop/resume.
> > 
> 
> If process traps, We dont need to stop/resume other threads.
> uprobes needs threads to quiesce when inserting/deleting the breakpoint.

Right, I don't think we need to at all. See the CoW thing from previous
emails.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/