Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- INFO: possible recursive locking -- (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<c10d2941>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x3d/0x4f

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Wed Jan 13 2010 - 22:09:29 EST


Miles Lane <miles.lane@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hmm. I tried your patch applied to a clean 2.6.33-rc4 tree, and used
> the same .config file. This time the INFO looks a lot like my
> original bug report. Weird. Maybe I am doing something wrong!

I agree weird. Either you don't have my patch working correctly or I
talk a good good game but I don't have a clue about lockdep
subclasses.

Grrr.

Now to see if I can find some time to dig into this. Thank you very
much for testing.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/