Re: [RFC 0/12][PATCH] SCHED_DEADLINE: core of the scheduling class

From: Raistlin
Date: Wed Jan 13 2010 - 05:46:41 EST


On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 15:41 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
> > +static unsigned long
> > +load_balance_deadline(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
> > + unsigned long max_load_move,
> > + struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
> > + int *all_pinned, int *this_best_prio)
> > +{
> > + /* for now, don't touch SCHED_DEADLINE tasks */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +move_one_task_deadline(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
> > + struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> The good news is that I've killed all that :-)
>
Yeah, good news then! :-D

By the way... I hope you all will soon hear from us something regarding
global-SMP and migrations with respect to this scheduler.

Thanks and regards,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, ReTiS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa (Italy)

http://blog.linux.it/raistlin / raistlin@xxxxxxxxx /
dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part