Re: [PATCH 3/7] sysfs: Keep an nlink count on sysfs directories.

[Cornelia Huck]

On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:21:51 -0800,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> On large directories sysfs_count_nlinks can be a significant
> bottleneck, so keep a count in sysfs_dirent.  If we exceed
> the maximum number of directory entries we can store return
> nlink of 1.  An nlink of 1 matches what reiserfs does in
> this case, and it let's find and similar utlities know that
> we have a the directory nlink can not be used for optimization
> purposes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/sysfs/dir.c   |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/sysfs/inode.c |   15 +--------------
>  fs/sysfs/mount.c |    1 +
>  fs/sysfs/sysfs.h |    1 +
>  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 

> @@ -420,6 +438,7 @@ int __sysfs_add_one(struct sysfs_addrm_cxt *acxt, struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
>  		return -EEXIST;
> 
>  	sd->s_parent = sysfs_get(acxt->parent_sd);
> +	sysfs_dir_inc_nlink(sd->s_parent);
> 
>  	sysfs_link_sibling(sd);
> 
> @@ -512,6 +531,7 @@ void sysfs_remove_one(struct sysfs_addrm_cxt *acxt, struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
> 
>  	BUG_ON(sd->s_flags & SYSFS_FLAG_REMOVED);
> 
> +	sysfs_dir_dec_nlink(sd->s_parent);
>  	sysfs_unlink_sibling(sd);
> 
>  	/* Update timestamps on the parent */

Shouldn't s_nlink be adjusted in sysfs_rename for the move case as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/