Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
> 

So..  what's happening here?  Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/