Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] generic sys_ipc wrapper

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Fri Jan 08 2010 - 05:59:57 EST


On Friday 08 January 2010 11:03:47 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 10:50:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Always return -EINVAL for the iBCS2 special case in SHMAT, and add a
> > prototype to linux/syscalls.h

ok, the changes look good.

> Add a generic implementation of the ipc demultiplexer syscall. Except for
> s390 and sparc64 all implementations of the sys_ipc are nearly identical.

I think the s390 version is trivial to add as well, like

SYSCALL_DEFINE5(s390_ipc, uint, call, int, first, unsigned long, second,
unsigned long, third, void __user *, ptr)
{
if (call == SEMTIMEDOP)
return sys_semtimedop(first, (struct sembuf __user *)ptr,
(unsigned) second,
(const struct timespec __user *)third);

return sys_ipc(call & 0xffff, first, second, third, ptr, 0);
}

But while going over the code again, I noticed that you broke sign extension
at least on powerpc and s390, possibly on all 64 bit machines:

> +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(ipc, unsigned int, call, int, first, int, second,
> + unsigned long, third, void __user *, ptr, long, fifth)
> +{
> + int version, ret;
> +
> + version = call >> 16; /* hack for backward compatibility */
> + call &= 0xffff;
> +
> + switch (call) {
> + case SEMOP:
> + return sys_semtimedop(first, (struct sembuf __user *)ptr,
> + second, NULL);

(unsigned)second, NULL

> + case SEMTIMEDOP:
> + return sys_semtimedop(first, (struct sembuf __user *)ptr,
> + second,

(unsigned)second,

> + (const struct timespec __user *)fifth);
> +
> + case SEMGET:
> + return sys_semget(first, second, third);

(int)second,

> + case SEMCTL: {
> + union semun fourth;
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (get_user(fourth.__pad, (void __user * __user *) ptr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return sys_semctl(first, second, third, fourth);

return sys_semctl(first, (int)second, third, fourth);

> + case MSGSND:
> + return sys_msgsnd(first, (struct msgbuf __user *) ptr,
> + second, third);

(size_t)second, third);

> + case MSGRCV:
> + switch (version) {
> + case 0: {
> + struct ipc_kludge tmp;
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&tmp,
> + (struct ipc_kludge __user *) ptr,
> + sizeof(tmp)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return sys_msgrcv(first, tmp.msgp, second,

return sys_msgrcv(first, tmp.msgp, (size_t)second,

> + tmp.msgtyp, third);
> + }
> + default:
> + return sys_msgrcv(first,
> + (struct msgbuf __user *) ptr,
> + second, fifth, third);

(size_t)second, fifth, third);

> + }
> + case MSGGET:
> + return sys_msgget((key_t) first, second);

return sys_msgget((key_t) first, (int)second);

> + case MSGCTL:
> + return sys_msgctl(first, second, (struct msqid_ds __user *)ptr);

return sys_msgctl(first, (int)second, (struct msqid_ds __user *)ptr);

> + case SHMAT:
> + switch (version) {
> + default: {
> + unsigned long raddr;
> + ret = do_shmat(first, (char __user *)ptr,
> + second, &raddr);

(int)second, &raddr);

> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + return put_user(raddr, (unsigned long __user *) third);
> + }
> + case 1:
> + /*
> + * This was the entry point for kernel-originating calls
> + * from iBCS2 in 2.2 days.
> + */
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + case SHMDT:
> + return sys_shmdt((char __user *)ptr);
> + case SHMGET:
> + return sys_shmget(first, second, third);

(size_t)second, &raddr);

> + case SHMCTL:
> + return sys_shmctl(first, second,

return sys_shmctl(first, (int)second,

> + (struct shmid_ds __user *) ptr);
> + default:
> + return -ENOSYS;
> + }
> +}

This is needed to make sure the upper half of the register is filled with
zero-extended or sign-extended correctly and does not contain random garbage
in the native 64 bit case. IIRC, x86_64 does not have this problem and mips64
may have the wrong code already. Alpha, parisc and ia64 don't have a native
sys_ipc and the rest are 32 bit, so they don't care.

Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/