Re: [PATCH 1/4] ksym_tracer: Fix to make the tracer work

From: Li Zefan
Date: Thu Dec 31 2009 - 00:55:09 EST


K.Prasad wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 02:22:22PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> ksym tracer doesn't work:
>>
>> # echo tasklist_lock:rw- > ksym_trace_filter
>> -bash: echo: write error: No such device
>>
>> It's because we pass to perf_event_create_kernel_counter()
>> a cpu number which is not present.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 10 +++++++---
>> kernel/trace/trace_ksym.c | 1 -
>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> index dbcbf6a..50dbd59 100644
>> --- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> +++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>> #include <linux/percpu.h>
>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>> #include <linux/smp.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
>> @@ -388,7 +389,8 @@ register_wide_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
>> if (!cpu_events)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>
>> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> + get_online_cpus();
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> pevent = per_cpu_ptr(cpu_events, cpu);
>> bp = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(attr, cpu, -1, triggered);
>>
>
> Frederic must have used for_each_possible_cpu() to account for CPUs that
> are offline at the time of registration, but may eventually turn online.
> Since register_wide_hw_breakpoint() interface is designed to deliver
> system-wide breakpoints, the debug registers of a new online CPU will
> should have the breakpoints populated to comprehensively notify all
> memory accesses over target address.
>
> I'd rather wait to hear from Frederic to know why
> perf_event_create_kernel_counter() returns an error when run for an
> offline cpu and how it can be solved.
>

See the comment in find_get_context() in kernel/perf_event.c:

/*
* We could be clever and allow to attach a event to an
* offline CPU and activate it when the CPU comes up, but
* that's for later.
*/
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);

So I think we can use for_each_possible_cpu() in the future, but not now.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/