Re: perf: counter and event question

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:09 +0100, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> >>>> like it is impossible to sample instructions with a period of 1? 
> >>>
> >>> Pretty much, imagine the cpu getting a trap every cycle.
> >>
> >> is this a hardware restriction? a slowdown is acceptable for me, as long
> >> as i am able to collect a huge number of samples accurately ...
> > 
> > Large number of samples and sample interval are only related through the
> > runtime of your application.
> > 
> > Use a sensible period (~10k ins) and run a 'little' longer.
> 
> well, for my application, i am not interested in statistical data, but
> in the order of the events ...
> (i am not doing profiling, but trying to gather a sequence of
> machine-structured data for an artistic project)

Well, then use the branch tracer, that will give you the relation
between blocks of code and is actually doable.

But I guess you could hack out the throttle and run the cycle counter
with period=1 for userspace only.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/