Re: lockdep possible recursive lock in slab parent->list->rlock inrc2

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Andi,

On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 13:06 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Get this on a NFS root system while booting
> This must be a recent change in the last week, 
> I didn't see it in a post rc1 git* from last week
> (I haven't done a exact bisect)
> 
> It's triggered by the r8169 driver close function, 
> but looks more like a slab problem?
> 
> I haven't checked it in detail if the locks are 
> really different or just lockdep not knowing 
> enough classes.

I broke the lockdep annotations in commit
ce79ddc8e2376a9a93c7d42daf89bfcbb9187e62 ("SLAB: Fix lockdep annotations
for CPU hotplug"). Does this fix things for you? Heiko, the following
patch should fix it for you too.

			Pekka

diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 7d41f15..7451bda 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static void init_node_lock_keys(int q)
 
 		l3 = s->cs_cachep->nodelists[q];
 		if (!l3 || OFF_SLAB(s->cs_cachep))
-			return;
+			continue;
 		lockdep_set_class(&l3->list_lock, &on_slab_l3_key);
 		alc = l3->alien;
 		/*
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static void init_node_lock_keys(int q)
 		 * for alloc_alien_cache,
 		 */
 		if (!alc || (unsigned long)alc == BAD_ALIEN_MAGIC)
-			return;
+			continue;
 		for_each_node(r) {
 			if (alc[r])
 				lockdep_set_class(&alc[r]->lock,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/