Re: workqueue thing

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 08:50 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> >  3) gets fragile at memory-pressure/reclaim
> 
> Shared dynamic pool is going to be affected by memory pressure no
> matter how you implement it.  cmwq tries to maintain stable level of
> workers and has forward progress guarantee.  If you're gonna do shared
> pool, it can't get much better. 

And here I'm questioning the very need for shared stuff, I don't see
any. That is, I'm not seeing it being worth the hassle.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/