Re: Wrong atime on recent kernels

[john stultz]

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 00:31 +0100, Petr TitÄra wrote: 
> Petr TitÄra napsal(a):
> > john stultz napsal(a):
> >> Let me know if you find anything that helps narrow this down.
> >>
> >
> > I know its far fetched, but is there something what is preventing 
> > xtime.tv_nsec to be exactly 999999999 near the end of update_wall_time 
> > in kernel/time/timekeeping.c?
> >
> Just to follow up. I'm asking because I see a lot of files with access 
> and/or modify times near the top of thousanth of second (see 
> `/etc/sysconfig/prelink' in my example) and I thing that addition of 1 
> to xtime.tv_nsec ath the end of update_wall_time can 'owerflow' to whole 
> second.


Oof! Yikes.

Yea, the sub-nanosecond rounding fix we added quite awhile back indeed
opens a hole where xtime.tv_nsec could be exactly 1sec. Good eye!

Of course, most of the timekeeping accessors handle this properly by
normalizing the timespec before returning, so its likely just users of
current_kernel_time() and direct accessors of xtime that might be bitten
here. 

And this probably was obscured before because the xtime_cache() was
normalized. Did you verify that reverting that patch I pointed you to
resolves the issue? If not, please do, so we can get this fixed up.

Now I'm a little baffled why you see it all the time on your boxes. For
this to trigger, you have to have an interrupt in the last ns of a
second, and then the window for these odd filesystem stamps is only open
for 1-10ms.

Sigh. Once we get the last of the non GENERIC_TIME arches converted to
arch_gettimeoffset, we can kill all of those rounding hacks and just
manage the sub-nanosecond portion sanely. I'm looking forward to that
day!


So again, Bravo on catching this!

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/