Re: 2.6.32 seemed to have broken nVidia MCP7A sata controller

From: Robert Hancock
Date: Sat Dec 19 2009 - 13:35:43 EST


On 12/19/2009 01:29 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
On 12/19/2009 01:13 AM, Mike Cui wrote:
I have an nVidia MCP7A AHCI controller. I upgraded to 2.6.32.2 and my
system deterministically freezes trying to mount file systems. Once in
a while it will come back and finish booting after freezing for 1
minute or 2. dmesg indicates that there were NCQ errors, but 2.6.31
anb before has always worked flawlessly for me. What changed in
2.6.32? I will be more than happy to help track down this issue.

ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
ata1.00: cmd 61/08:00:4f:ad:03/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 4096 out
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata1: hard resetting link
ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata1.00: device reported invalid CHS sector 0

Looks like things are timing out, and then go downhill from there. This
explanation of timeout gives some hints on possible causes:
http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Libata_error_messages#Error_classes

The ideal would be if you could bisect between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32, to see
if it's a software change that is the cause.

Looking at drivers/ata/ahci.c history, the only thing that -might- cause
problems is 388539f3ff0cf1de926b03f94e1eec112358f74d ('git show $commit'
for full commit info and diff).

I suspect that as well (it's the commit that adds FPDMA auto-activate on DMA setup FIS support). Your drive indicates it's supported but it's possible it's broken on that drive or the controller. If the drive doesn't set the activate bit in the DMA setup FIS properly or the controller doesn't respect it, then FPDMA requests will stall.

Mike, can you try and revert that patch, or else just change this line in drivers/ata/ahci.c:

pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ | ATA_FLAG_FPDMA_AA;

to

pi.flags |= ATA_FLAG_NCQ;

and rebuild and see if it works better?

I tend to suspect the controller is the problem (I've got WD drives that work fine with AA on Intel AHCI, though it could be model-specific). I guess the only way to verify for sure which one it is would be if someone else had that particular drive model on a different AHCI controller and could verify if it worked with 2.6.32+ or not.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/