Re: revert "config FS_JOURNAL_INFO"

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option
>> to remove unused area, right?
>
> We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality.
>
>> If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep
>> this kind of patches out of tree?
>
> Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree.
> But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info
> to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something.

Why doesn't this use EMBEDDED?

I.e.

	boot "xxx" if EMBEDDED
	default y

style Kconfig.

Only reason which seems reasonable is "this is done only for one pointer
on task_struct". This reason seems something like "You care, but I don't
care it". And, other reasons is *normal* situation on EMBEDDED, right?

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/