Re: [PATCH] Security: Implement prctl(PR_SET_NETWORK, PR_NETWORK_OFF) semantics.

[Eric W. Biederman]

Michael Stone <michael@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 23bd09c..5b38db0 100644
> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
>  		dumpable = get_dumpable(task->mm);
>  	if (!dumpable && !capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
>  		return -EPERM;
> +	if (current->network)
> +		return -EPERM;

The principle should be: you gain no privileges by ptracing.
Therefore this check should be:

	if (current->network && !task->network)
		return -EPERM;

Which keeps the ptrace logic from being a larger hammer than it needs
to be.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/