Re: [PATCH] FRV: Fix no-hardware-breakpoint case

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Dec 15 2009 - 02:24:59 EST



* David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If there is no hardware breakpoint support, modify_user_hw_breakpoint() tries
> to return a NULL pointer through as an 'int' return value:
>
> In file included from kernel/exit.c:53:
> include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h: In function 'modify_user_hw_breakpoint':
> include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h:96: warning: return makes integer from pointer without a cast
>
> Return 0 instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 69f07a9..e268388 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ register_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> struct task_struct *tsk) { return NULL; }
> static inline int
> modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp,
> - struct perf_event_attr *attr) { return NULL; }
> + struct perf_event_attr *attr) { return 0; }

Note, this patch is wrong as it only papers over the warning without
understanding the underlying bug: the right fix is to return an error code.

The latest perf update has the right fix - AFAICS Linus did the conflict
resolution correctly so upstream should be fine.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/