Re: Badness at net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:293

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Sat Dec 12 2009 - 04:22:27 EST


Le 12/12/2009 10:03, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:43:10 -0800 (PST)
>
>> today I upgraded from 2.6.32-rc7 to the latest -git (mainline) and after a
>> few hours the messages below appeared in the log. Apparently "privoxy" was
>> very busy handling connections, but the messages never appeared with
>> earlier kernels.
>>
>> Full dmesg & .config is on:
>> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-git/inet_accept/
>
> Yeah I started seeing this on one of my machines too, the
> assertion is:
>
> WARN_ON(newsk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV);
>
> I wonder if some of the refactorings we did to allow per-route
> SACK/DSACK/etc. controls messed some sequence of state changes
> on TCP sockets. But I can't find anything obvious in those
> commits.

Could it be about syncookies patches ?

tcp_create_openreq_child() changes ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/