Re: [patch 8/9] Documentation: Fix invalid rcu assumptions

[Linus Torvalds]

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, David Howells wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > -197          * we use RCU protection here
> > +196          * caller must be holding the RCU readlocke
> 
> You mean "readlock" I suspect.

Or maybe he's talking about ye olde readlocke, used widely for OS research 
throughout the middle ages. You still find that spelling in some really 
old CS literature.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/