Re: [patch 9/9] security: Fix invalid rcu assumptions in comments

[David Howells]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 1) held spinlocks are not equivalent to rcu_read_lock
> 
> 2) access to current_cred() is safe as only current can modify its
>    own credentials.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/