Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm hugetlb x86: add hugepage support to pagemap

[Naoya Horiguchi]

> I kind of dislike the practice of putting all the changelog in patch
> [0/n] and then leaving the patches themselves practically
> unchangelogged.  Because

Sorry, I agree.

> 
> a) Someone (ie: me) needs to go and shuffle all the text around so
>    that the information gets itself into the git record.  We don't add
>    changelog-only commits to git!
> 
> b) Someone (ie: me) might decide to backport a subset of the patches
>    into -stable.  Now someone (ie: me) needs to carve up the changelogs
>    so that the pieces which go into -stable still make standalone sense.
> 
> I'm not sure that I did this particularly well in this case.  Oh well.
> 
> 
> Please confirm that
> mm-hugetlb-fix-hugepage-memory-leak-in-walk_page_range.patch is
> suitable for a -stable backport without inclusion of
> mm-hugetlb-add-hugepage-support-to-pagemap.patch.  I think it is.
> 

I think that's OK.

Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/