Re: 2.6.31 under "heavy" NFS load.

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:22:53PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Ok, I still haven't had the "excact same" workload put on the host, but
> it has been running on the patched kernel for 8 days now and I havent
> seen load numbers over 32 while service 1100MB/s over NFS (dd'ing 512
> bytes blocks out of the server from the clients) while doing local disk
> IO for an iowait of ~25% (4 cores sucking what they can). This workload
> is "similar" to the one sending it to load numbers of over 100 earlier.
> 
> So I'm confident that the problem is solved by reverting the patch.

OK, I'm applying the revert for 2.6.33.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/