Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator

[Christoph Lameter]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> That turns out to be _very_ hard. How about something like the following
> untested patch which delays slab_destroy() while we're under nc->lock.

Code changes to deal with a diagnostic issue?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/