Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure

From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Mon Nov 23 2009 - 11:32:23 EST


Hi Samuel,

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:26:07PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:35:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Samuel,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/power/pcf50633-charger.c: In function 'pcf50633_mbc_get_usb_online_status':
> > drivers/power/pcf50633-charger.c:147: error: 'struct pcf50633' has no member named 'mbc_pdev'
> >
> > Caused by commit 4c2e3bacc050f0ebf884954bb007616c162564cd ("mfd: pcf50633
> > - fix error handling during probe") from the mfd tree interacting with
> > commit c329795052aa339850a45fab649ab97a36905136 ("pcf50633: Query charger
> > status directly") from the battery tree.
> Could we split the above fix so that we get back to the:
>
> struct platform_device *rtc_pdev;
> struct platform_device *mbc_pdev;
> struct platform_device *adc_pdev;
> struct platform_device *input_pdev;
> struct platform_device *regulator_pdev[PCF50633_NUM_REGULATORS];
>
> structure ? We can move to the index based structure after the next merge
> window. That would make my life easier in terms of tree dependencies.
> If you dont have time to do this change, I'll do it some time this week.
>

Please feel free to drop or reschedule the patch as you see fit. I don't
have any problem if it will go in later.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/