[PATCH] JFFS2: min/max confusion?

[Roel Kluin]

MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/jffs2/summary.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

unless I am mistaken?

diff --git a/fs/jffs2/summary.c b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
index 6caf1e1..800171d 100644
--- a/fs/jffs2/summary.c
+++ b/fs/jffs2/summary.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
 int jffs2_sum_init(struct jffs2_sb_info *c)
 {
-	uint32_t sum_size = max_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
+	uint32_t sum_size = min_t(uint32_t, c->sector_size, MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE);
 
 	c->summary = kzalloc(sizeof(struct jffs2_summary), GFP_KERNEL);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/