Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add all TWL4030 regulators to Regulator framework

[Liam Girdwood]

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:32:25AM +0000, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:06 +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> 
> > > Would you mind carrying this one with your twl4030-mfd branch ? It doesnt
> > > apply cleanly to my tree due to the missing twl4030 patches from Peter.
> 
> > > Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > Juha, this doesn't apply to regulator for-next either. Is it possible to
> > split it out into a patch for mfd and a patch for regulator (against
> > their for-next branches) ?
> 
> Either the existing twl4030-mfd branch or split patches work for me.

What's the upstream path for your twl4030-mfd ASoC branch ? 

Regulator + mfd patches either go upstream via the regulator or mfd
repositories.  

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/