Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool

[Li Zefan]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>> (2) doing "perf kmem record" on machine A (think embedded here) and 
>>> then "perf kmem report" on machine B. I haven't tried kmemtrace-user 
>>> for a while but it did support both of them quite nicely at some 
>>> point.
>> Everything needed and machine-specific will be recorded in perf.data, 
>> so this should already been supported. I'll try it.
> 
> Right now the DSOs are not recorded in the perf.data - but it would be 
> useful to add it and to turn perf.data into a self-sufficient capture of 
> all relevant data, which can be analyzed on any box.
> 

But still 'perf kmem' should function better than kmemtrace-user,
since the latter records no more than raw trace data.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/