Re: [PATCH] procfs: make /proc style symlinks behave like "normal"symlinks

[Pavel Machek]

> > Adding all of the short comings to followlink that readlink has is a problem,
> > especially as followlink does much better now.
> > 
> > At a practical level I think your changes are much easier to exploit than
> > Pavels contrived example.
> > 
> > I really don't have any problems with your first patch to proc to add the
> > missing revalidate.
> > 
> 
> Thanks, that makes sense. The raciness was evident once you pointed it
> out, so I think you're correct that we can't take this approach.
> 
> Adding the missing revalidations is fine, but I don't believe that
> helps to fix Pavel's issue. I'll go back and take a more careful look
> at the suggestion that Miklos made and see whether it makes sense to
> implement a new FS_* flag for this, and see what it'll take to fix
> Pavel's issue.

One posibility would be to make open(/proc/XX/fd/XX) behave like
dup(). That should solve the NFS problems, too, no?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/