Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: Update experimental tags

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

Alan Cox wrote:

> >     I'd suggest to address the delay by another, separate patch to both 
> > pata_hpt37x and pata_hpt3x2n drivers, and accept Bart's original patch for 
> > bit reversing...
> >     
>
> If you can confirm the 371N is fine without switching to I/O cycles then
>   

  HPT371N datasheet says that the SRC1/2 registers are dual-mapped to 
PCI and I/O space. Are you paranoid enough to want me to test the 
drivers on the board with HPT371N too? :-)

> I agree entirely with that and I'll push the udelay(10) into all three
>   

  I can't say anything about pata_hpt36x, I don't think I have HPT 
drivers that old...

> plus the drivers/ide one unless Bart beats me to it.
>   

  I could beat you to it as well. :-)

> Alan

WBR, Sergei


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/