Re: [PATCH] x86: eliminate redundant/contradicting cache line sizeconfig options

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Thu Nov 19 2009 - 10:58:32 EST


On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:13:07 +0100
Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My other point was just this, but I don't care too much. But it is
> worded pretty negatively. The key here is that increasing the value
> too large tends to only cost a very small amount of size (and no
> increase in cacheline foot print, only RAM).

128 has a pretty significant impact on TPC-C benchmarks.....
it was the top issue until mainline fixed it to default to 64

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/