Re: [patch -mm] mm: slab allocate memory section nodemask forlarge systems

[Gary Hade]

Hi David,

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:19:30PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> Nodemasks should not be allocated on the stack for large systems (when it
> is larger than 256 bytes) since there is a threat of overflow.
> 
> This patch causes the unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() nodemask to be
> allocated on the stack for smaller systems and be allocated by slab for
> larger systems.

I notice that there are many other functions that always allocate
nodemask_t objects on the stack.  In addition to several that add
a single instance to the stack, cpuset_attach() in kernel/cpuset.c
adds 2 instances and all that are created by using SYSCALL_DEFINE4()
in mm/mempolicy.c add 3 instances.  Are there plans to correct the
other functions as well or is there something about
unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() that makes it more likely to
cause stack overflows than the others?

Gary

-- 
Gary Hade
System x Enablement
IBM Linux Technology Center
503-578-4503  IBM T/L: 775-4503
garyhade@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/