Re: [PATCH 0/13] sysfs lazification.

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 - 04:11:50 EST


Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 03:53:56AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> The sysfs code updates the vfs caches immediately when the sysfs data
>> structures change causing a lot of unnecessary complications. The
>> following patchset untangles that beast. Allowing for simpler
>> more straight forward code, the removal of a hack from the vfs
>> to support sysfs, and human comprehensible locking on sysfs.
>>
>> Most of these patches have already been reviewed and acked from the
>> last time I had time to work on sysfs.
>>
>> In net the patches look like:
>
> Can you resend these based on the review that you just got, with the new
> acks and changes so that I can apply them?

Are you going to apply them soon? If you don't have time I can start
a sysfs tree and just ask Linus to pull them.

Eric



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/