Re: [PATCH 08/21] scheduler: implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr()

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 - 00:14:47 EST


On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:45:13 am Tejun Heo wrote:
> Implement force_cpus_allowed_ptr() which is similar to
> set_cpus_allowed_ptr() but bypasses PF_THREAD_BOUND check and ignores
> cpu_active() status as long as the target cpu is online. This will be
> used for concurrency-managed workqueue.

Can we drop the silly _ptr() postfix? It was a hack someone added to
avoid churning set_cpus_allowed(), and no need to repeat here.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/