Re: [PATCH 4/14] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than thedeprecated cpumask_t

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h |    4 ++--
>  arch/x86/lib/msr.c         |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Mind sending this against latest -tip? We already have:

  b8a4754: x86, msr: Unify rdmsr_on_cpus/wrmsr_on_cpus

which makes your patch not apply:

 patching file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 247.
 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
 patching file arch/x86/lib/msr.c
 Hunk #1 FAILED at 78.
 Hunk #2 FAILED at 107.
 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/lib/msr.c

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/