Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27

From: Jayson R. King
Date: Mon Oct 05 2009 - 12:04:51 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] drivers-core: nullify private pointer on device-release"
Previous message: Jeff Chua: "2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?"
In reply to: David Newall: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27"
Next in thread: David Newall: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Newall wrote:
> Shouldn't patches be sent as attachments?

Not according to Documentation/SubmittingPatches

Jayson

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] drivers-core: nullify private pointer on device-release"
Previous message: Jeff Chua: "2.6.32-rc3: low mem - only 378MB on x86_32 with 64GB. Why?"
In reply to: David Newall: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27"
Next in thread: David Newall: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] BFS backport to 2.6.27"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]