Re: [.32-rc3] scheduler: iwlagn consistently high in "waiting forCPU"

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Oct 05 2009 - 10:25:30 EST


On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:13:31 +0200
Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Monday 05 October 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > With .32-rc3 I'm getting occasional skips from amarok while playing
> > music from an NFS share (3 today so far), something I've not had in
> > a long time.
> >
> > The reason looks to be that latencytop consistently shows 'iwlagn'
> > as the top affected process with "Scheduler: waiting for CPU".
> > Values of 100-140 ms occur frequently, but I've also seen higher
> > values (180, 207). I don't remember seeing iwlagn high in the list
> > before, but I have not checked earlier kernels yet.
> >
> > Added to that 'phy0' also frequently shows high with values of
> > 25-75 ms.
> >
> > The system is otherwise essentially idle. Other processes typically
> > show a latency < 5 ms.
>
> If I give the system some work to do (like compiling a kernel), the
> latencies on iwlagn and phy0 disappear (values < 5 ms).
> Is this related to ondemand frequency scaling?

shouldn't be.... but

can you do a 5 second or so timechart recording of this?
That will capture all scheduler delays as well as the P states etc....

(to do a timechart recording, first make sure debugfs is mounted, and
then do in tools/perf

./perf timechart record sleep 5

then you can turn it into an SVG with

./perf timechart

)


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/