Re: [PATCH] battery: Fix charge_now returned by broken batteries

From: Miguel Ojeda
Date: Sun Oct 04 2009 - 19:59:31 EST


On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<astarikovskiy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>>
>> On Sunday 04 October 2009, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Alex,
>>
>>> This is not my rule, it was/is the rule of power device class. If you do
>>> not agree to it, please change
>>> appropriate documentation.
>>
>> I think we're talking about two different things. ÂOne thing is that we
>> shouldn't put any _arbitrary_ interpretation rules into the kernel, which
>> I
>> agree with. ÂThe other one is that if there's a _known_ _broken_ hardware
>> and one possible way of handling it is to add a quirk into the kernel, we
>> should at least consider doing that.
>>
>> In my opinion adding a quirk for a broken hardware is not equivalent to
>> "inferring not available properties using some heuristics or mathematical
>> model", if that's what you're referring to.
>
> No, this is not a clear "bug" and not a clear "fix". Please read my reply to
> Miguel.
>
>>
>> That said, the patch should not change the _default_ code in order to
>> handle
>> the quirky hardware correctly. ÂIMO, the quirky hardware should be
>> recognized
>
> It will change behaviour of at least Samsung notebooks, for which I
> personally saw the charge_now/full_charge being greater then design_charge.
>>
>> during initialisation, if possible, and later handled in a special way.
>> ÂIf
>> it's not possible to detect the broken hardware reliably, I agree that
>> there's
>> nothing we can do about that in the kernel.
>
> I am still not sure if we have a broken hardware here.

I have no idea about batteries, but jumping from 5950 mAh to 7650 mAh
within one second does not seem non-broken to me. ;)

>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/