Re: [Bug #14256] kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435

From: Mikael Pettersson
Date: Sun Oct 04 2009 - 19:07:44 EST


Rafael J. Wysocki writes:
> On Sunday 04 October 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14256
> > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext3/super.c:435
> > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Date : 2009-09-21 7:29 (11 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125351816109264&w=3D4
> >
> > The exact same bug (same cause, same symptom) just hit me again in 2.6.32-rc1.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Could you check the current Linus' tree, please? There are some known
> regression fixes in there.

I tried simplified versions of the bug trigger on two machines
running 2.6.32-rc1-git6, and neither triggered the kernel bug.

The original recipe involved doing a glibc rebuild, run its test
suite, install it, and reboot. Today however machine 1 was already
doing a rebuild so after the rebuild it did a reboot into the new
kernel before the install. The second machine booted the new kernel
directly to install the binary packages from the first machine.

I'll re-run the full bug trigger recipe on a third machine later next
week (it must rebuild glibc itself anyway due to arch differences).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/