Re: [this_cpu_xx V4 02/20] this_cpu: X86 optimized this_cpuoperations

[Ingo Molnar]

* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Basically the existing percpu ops can be used for this_cpu variants  
>>> that allow operations also on dynamically allocated percpu data.  
>>> However, we do not pass a reference to a percpu variable in. Instead 
>>> a dynamically or statically allocated percpu variable is provided.
>>>
>>> Preempt, the non preempt and the irqsafe operations generate the same 
>>> code. It will always be possible to have the requires per cpu  
>>> atomicness in a single RMW instruction with segment override on x86.
>>>
>>> 64 bit this_cpu operations are not supported on 32 bit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
>
> I haven't looked at the series in detail but AFAICT the SLUB patches 
> depend on the x86 ones. Any suggestions how to get all this into 
> linux-next? Should I make a topic branch in slab.git on top of -tip or 
> something?

I'd suggest to keep these patches together in the right topical tree: 
Tejun's percpu tree. Any problem with that approach?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/