Re: [PATCH] x86: Use __builtin_memset and __builtin_memcpy for memset/memcpy

[Andi Kleen]

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From ebb81aab0c3df19771ebc0eec1261ae314ddc0af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:21:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: Use __builtin_memset and __builtin_memcpy for memset/memcpy
>
> GCC provides reasonable memset/memcpy functions itself, with __builtin_memset
> and __builtin_memcpy. For the "unknown" cases, it'll fall back to our
> current existing functions, but for fixed size versions it'll inline
> something smart. Quite often that will be the same as we have now,
> but sometimes it can do something smarter (for example, if the code
> then sets the first member of a struct, it can do a shorter memset).
>
> In addition, and this is more important, gcc knows which registers and
> such are not clobbered (while for our asm version it pretty much
> acts like a compiler barrier), so for various cases it can avoid reloading
> values.
>
> The effect on codesize is shown below on my typical laptop .config:
>
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
> 5605675	2041100	6525148	14171923	 d83f13	vmlinux.before
> 5595849	2041668	6525148	14162665	 d81ae9	vmlinux.after

I tried this some time ago, but it it generates bad code on some 
gcc 3 versions.

You really need to test such kind of changes on a wide variety
of compilers, not assuming everyone uses the same version as you.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/