Re: [PATCH 03/19] scheduler: implement workqueue scheduler class

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thu Oct 01 2009 - 16:05:31 EST




On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Yeah. That scheme was hobbled by signal semantics: it looked hard to do
> the 'flip a reserve thread with a blocked thread' trick in the scheduler
> while still keeping all the signal details in place.

I think we should look at David Wheeler's advice: "Any problem in computer
science can be solved with another level of indirection".

In particular, my favourite solution to this is to split "struct
thread_struct" into a new part, which would be "CPU state".

In other words, all threadlets would share one single "struct
thread_struct" (and thus local signal state), but they would then each
have a "struct cpu_state" associated with them, which includes the kernel
stack. And that cpu_state thing would not be preempted, it would be
something like a round-robin cooperative scheduling that is only invoced
when a threadlet goes to sleep.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/