Re: [ofa-general] Re: [GIT PULL] please pull ummunotify

[Pavel Machek]

On Tue 2009-09-15 07:57:56, Roland Dreier wrote:
> 
>  > I don't remember seeing discussion of this on lkml. Yes it  is in
>  > -next...
> 
> eg http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/31/197 and followups, or search for v2
> and earlier patches.

Well... it seems little overspecialized. Just modifying libc to
provide hooks you want looks like better solution.

>  > Basically it allows app to 'trace itself'? ...with interesting mmap()
>  > interface, exporting int to userspace, hoping it behaves atomically...? 
> 
> Yes, it allows app to trace what the kernel does to memory mappings.  I
> don't believe there's any real issue to atomicity of mmap'ed memory,
> since userspace really just tests whether read value is == to old read
> value or not.

That still needs memory barriers etc.. to ensure reliable operation,
no?
									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/