Re: [PATCH] USB: ftdi_sio: Remove tty->low_latency.

[Michael Trimarchi]

Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:21:07PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>   
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:03:47 +0200
> > Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >     
>
>   
> > > Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2009 17:40:23 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > >       
> > > > Is there a reason why this was not fixed in ftdi_sio (and whiteheat?)
> > > > along with the other drivers?
> > > >         
>
>   
> > > No good reason. They escaped my grep pattern. Mea culpa.
> > >       
>
>   
> > ftdi_sio is correct with low_latency set as it uses a work queue to
> > process the packets received.
> >     
>
> AFAICT it only uses the work queue if tty_buffer_request_room fails to
> allocate enough space. This being the exception, the completion
> handler normally processes the packets in interrupt context and this is
> where I get my lockdep traces (and it happens every time I hit the echo
> or throttle paths).
>   
Hi,

Using two urb, double buffering and schedule a tasklet to complete the
the reading phase. The usb will use the other free urb during receiving 
process.
I think remove tty_latency is not a good fix.

Michael
> /Johan
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/