Re: [PATCH] nommu: Correct is_vmamloc_or_module_addr() definition.

[Paul Mundt]

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:08:30PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:07:06 +0900
> Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Commit 81ac3ad9061dd9cd490ee92f0c5316a14d77ce18 broke the nommu build
> > due to is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() not being marked inline. Fix it up.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> Ah, sorry. I think Andrew queues the same patch.
> 
Ah, I'm too slow, David already caught it:

commit 934831d060ccd5471ecbc562804a8d3ccd6e562c
Author: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Sep 24 12:33:32 2009 +0100

    NOMMU: Fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be inline

    The NOMMU fallback for is_vmalloc_or_module_addr() should be static inline,
    not just static, in linux/mm.h.

    Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Sorry for the noise!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/