Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] cpu: pseries: Offline state framework.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 10:48 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 07:33 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > I'm still thinking this is a bad idea.
> > 
> > The OS should only know about online/offline.
> > 
> > Use the hypervisor interface to deal with the cpu once its offline.
> > 
> > That is, I think this interface you propose is a layering violation.
> > 
> I don't quite follow your logic here. This is useful for more than just
> hypervisors. For example, take the HV out of the picture for a moment
> and imagine that the HW has the ability to offline CPU in various power
> levels, with varying latencies to bring them back.

cpu-hotplug is an utter slow path, anybody saying latency and hotplug in
the same sentence doesn't seem to grasp either or both concepts.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/