Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Sep 22 2009 - 05:03:16 EST



* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200
>
> >
> > based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets
> > x86 stay with regular allocations.
> >
> > While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around,
> > I see no other way to please both sides.
>
> If you guys want to maintain two implementations of the same thing,
> that's fine with me :)

I take this as an acked-by :-)

I'll reshape these patches on top of the counters -> events rename.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/