Re: [GIT PULL] ocfs2 changes for 2.6.32

[George Spelvin]

> or make it one level simpler?
> Have a "wait for all started copies" call only.... saves a ton of book
> keeping, and is likely what people will use it for in the end anyway.

Aieeee!  No, no, a thousand times, no!

We do NOT need another blocking primitive that can't play well with others.
That would be a HORRIBLE design mistake.

The whole benefit of Linus' scheme is that it returns a file descriptor.
Any waiting should be done by the standard event-wait system call, poll().
It should return POLLIN when there's an interesting event (such as copy
completion), and should remain valid until explicitly close()d.

There's nothing wrong with a convenience function that waits for all
started copies, but I don't see a reason to design a new kernel interface
for the purpose.

A few more points:
- If the file descriptor returned by copyfile() is guaranteed not to be 0
  (even if that is available), perhaps it should be guaranteed to be >= 3.
- We might as well make the returned file descriptor O_CLOEXEC by default.
  You can always change it back if you want to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/