Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2

[Pekka Enberg]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Lets just keep SLQB back until the basic issues with memoryless nodes are
> resolved. There does not seem to be an easy way to deal with this. Some
> thought needs to go into how memoryless node handling relates to per cpu
> lists and locking. List handling issues need to be addressed before SLQB.
> can work reliably. The same issues can surface on x86 platforms with weird
> NUMA memory setups.
>
> Or just allow SLQB for !NUMA configurations and merge it now.

I'm holding on to it until the issues are resolved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/