Re: [GIT PULL] a few writeback fixes

[Jens Axboe]

On Mon, Sep 21 2009, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 21-09-09 14:56:20, Jens Axboe wrote:
>   Hi Jens,
> 
> > Jan, since we're not really sure on the inode wait yet, I dropped that
> > patch. It's definitely something to look into, as are the congestion
> > bits.
>   OK.
> 
> 								Honza
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index 1eea4fa..6bb510b 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
> >  	unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> >  	unsigned long pages_written = 0;
> >  	unsigned long write_chunk = sync_writeback_pages();
> > +	unsigned long pause = 1;
> >  
> >  	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
> >  
> > @@ -561,7 +562,15 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
> >  		if (pages_written >= write_chunk)
> >  			break;		/* We've done our duty */
> >  
> > -		schedule_timeout(1);
> > +		schedule_timeout_interruptible(pause);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
> > +		 * default of taking a 100ms nap.
> > +		 */
> > +		pause <<= 1;
> > +		if (pause < HZ / 10)
> > +			pause = HZ / 10;
>   Isn't this check the other way around?

Gah it is, how silly. I have fixed it up. Thanks, eagle eyes :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/