Re: [PATCH] Remove broken by design and by implementation devtmpfsmaintenance disaster

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:35:32 +0100
Scott James Remnant <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 14:13 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > > >  * A static dev is faster.
> > > 
> > > A static /dev is unreliable and unpredictable, and can not be
> > > used in any not very limited and controlled environment. It's
> > > pure theory for
> > 
> > Moblin appears to be the fastest boot and doesn't use it. I fact
> > Arjan seems pretty anti
> > 
> And of the "ordinary" distros, Ubuntu has the fastest boot and we are
> very keen to use devtmpfs, and I am very pro.

personally I consider Moblin an ordinary distro. 


> 
> I don't really see the issue here.  If Arjan doesn't want to use
> devtmpfs for Moblin, he doesn't have to.

my biggest objection was to the use of boot time as argument.
That was and still is deceiving and false. There may be other arguments
for devfs, but I'm not going to get in the middle of those. But boot
time isn't it.

I do share frustration with Eric on how Kay and Greg have handled this.
It really felt like a combination of bullying, ignoring any contrarian
argument and just ramming stuff down. Not at all unlike the original
devfs fiasco. It has left me with a pretty bad taste in my mouth and
am pretty disappointed; I expected better.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/