Re: [PATCH] virtio_console: Add support for multiple ports for generic guest and host communication

[Markus Armbruster]

Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> This device is very much a serial port.  I don't see any reason not
>>> to treat it like one.
>>>     
>>
>> Here are a few
>>
>> - You don't need POSIX multi-open semantics, hangup and the like
>>   
>
> We do actually want hangup and a few other of the tty specific ops.  The 
> only thing we really don't want is a baud rate.

And a line discipline, and messing with the controlling terminal, and
group/session ID, and window size, and software flow control, ...

>> - Seek makes sense on some kinds of fixed attributes
>>   
>
> I don't think we're dealing with fixed attributes.  These are streams.  
> Fundamentally, this is a paravirtual uart.  The improvement over a 
> standard uart is that there can be a larger number of ports, ports can 
> have some identification associated with them, and we are not 
> constrained to the emulated hardware interface which doesn't exist on 
> certain platforms (like s390).
[...]

Well, really fundamentally, this is just a reliable full-duplex byte
stream, with connect and hangup notification.  To me, that sounds more
like TCP with an address family almost, but not quite AF_UNIX, but that
case was thrown out of court long ago, so here we are.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/