Re: [stable] [patch 00/48] 2.6.27.32-stable review

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:22:22AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> [On holiday, answering from my nominally internet capable cellphone - please make allowances ...]
> 
> The stable patch claiming to correspond to Linus' tree patch
> 56f7efe48d57dda9e59e23ab161c118271cce815 and merged in 2.6.27.sth
> (eyact version not at hand) and 2.6.28.10 differs from the backported
> patch I submitted for stable myself. It breaks the driver completely,
> causing an oops and system malfunctions as soon as the device is
> connected. (Sorry for not noticing the vital difference at the time.)

No problem.

> The attached patch would fix the error by moving the code inswrted at
> the wrong place by the broken backported patch,, to the correct place
> where it went in the original patch. 

I see no patch attached here :(

> Alternativelyy, the broken backported could be reverted and my
> original bacport merged instead, if you can still find it.

I can not.

> Sorry for lack of references as i don't have acces to my development
> machine from here. Hope to have Cleared up the situation, anyway.

Can you send me what you need applied to the latest 2.6.27-stable tree
to fix this up so we can finally resolve this?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/